Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Alan Simpson My Damn Hero!

OMG A politican who tells it like it is! Simpson for President!


Former senator Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) didn't mince words in weighing in on the crop of Republicans mulling presidential campaigns for the next election cycle during an appearance on MSNBC's "Hardball" on Monday.
When asked for his assessment of the emerging GOP field by anchor Chris Matthews, the co-chair of President Obama's deficit commission didn't hold back in criticizing members of his party on social issues.
"Who the hell is for abortion?," asked Simpson, who has developed a reputation for making blunt and colorful remarks. "I don't know anybody running around with a sign that says, have an abortion, they're wonderful. They're hideous. But they're a deeply intimate and personal decision, and I don't think men legislators should even vote on the issue."
Simpson went on to address the issue of gay rights. "Then you've got homosexuality," he said. "You've got 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.' We have homophobes in our party. That's disgusting to me. We're all human beings. We're all God's children. ... [Former Pennsylvania senator Rick] Santorum has said some cruel things, cruel, cruel things about homosexuals. Ask him about it. See if he attributes the cruelness of his remarks years ago. Foul."
Simpson was presumably referring to remarks made by Santorum in 2003 that have already resurfaced in the early stages of the GOP presidential primary campaign. CNN reported at the time on the comments in question:
In [an] AP interview, Santorum criticized homosexuality as he discussed a pending Supreme Court case over a sodomy law in Texas. "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual (gay) sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything," Santorum said in the AP interview.

"That's the kind of guys that are going to be on my ticket, you know, makes you sort out hard what Reagan said, you know, 'stick with your folks,'" explained Simpson to Matthews. "But I'm not sticking with people who are homophobic, anti-women, you know, moral values while you're diddling your secretary while you're giving a speech on moral values. Come on. Get off of it."
 

Monday, April 11, 2011

Great story on Farkas trial by Ocala.com

The Farkas trial so far: Who misled whom?
The trial is expected to last the rest of the month
By Suevon Lee
Staff writer

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Lee Farkas took a small mortgage company and near single-handedly built it into a national giant that funded billions of dollars in residential mortgages. But prosecutors say he relied on others — well-positioned officials at his company and its main banking partner — to help implement what the government calls a $1.9 billion scheme that brought down both institutions in 2009.
As the first week of Farkas’ bank, wire and securities fraud trial wound down last week in federal court, the co-dependent relationships between Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.’s former chairman and his associates were laid bare for a jury.
At best, these connections could yield generous perks for friends of Farkas: a $200,000 loan, no questions asked; a $300,000 salary advance; a company-funded personal housekeeper.
At worst, the relationships allowed troubling behavior to continue and led to anxiety and mounting pressure.
Raymond Bowman, Taylor Bean’s former president, spoke to the latter dynamic during his testimony on Tuesday. He recalled the day when stress over Taylor Bean’s “Plan B” scheme, in which fake mortgage loan data allegedly was submitted to Colonial Bank, led him to abruptly quit.
But his resolve wasn’t strong enough: He said Farkas paid a visit to his home that evening in late 2008. Bowman told his boss, “I can’t do this anymore. This is driving me crazy.”
Farkas’ response to his lieutenant, a former bond trader at SunTrust Bank in Atlanta, was that Taylor Bean’s dealings with Colonial were not Bowman’s problem; it was “his issue.”
Thus continued Bowman’s employment at Taylor Bean. He was paid $440,000 a year; his ill mother was supplied with a private nurse; and he had part-ownership in a fine-dining restaurant partnership in Ocala, among other perks.

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Lee Farkas took a small mortgage company and near single-handedly built it into a national giant that funded billions of dollars in residential mortgages. But prosecutors say he relied on others — well-positioned officials at his company and its main banking partner — to help implement what the government calls a $1.9 billion scheme that brought down both institutions in 2009.
As the first week of Farkas’ bank, wire and securities fraud trial wound down last week in federal court, the co-dependent relationships between Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.’s former chairman and his associates were laid bare for a jury.
At best, these connections could yield generous perks for friends of Farkas: a $200,000 loan, no questions asked; a $300,000 salary advance; a company-funded personal housekeeper.
At worst, the relationships allowed troubling behavior to continue and led to anxiety and mounting pressure.
Raymond Bowman, Taylor Bean’s former president, spoke to the latter dynamic during his testimony on Tuesday. He recalled the day when stress over Taylor Bean’s “Plan B” scheme, in which fake mortgage loan data allegedly was submitted to Colonial Bank, led him to abruptly quit.
But his resolve wasn’t strong enough: He said Farkas paid a visit to his home that evening in late 2008. Bowman told his boss, “I can’t do this anymore. This is driving me crazy.”
Farkas’ response to his lieutenant, a former bond trader at SunTrust Bank in Atlanta, was that Taylor Bean’s dealings with Colonial were not Bowman’s problem; it was “his issue.”
Thus continued Bowman’s employment at Taylor Bean. He was paid $440,000 a year; his ill mother was supplied with a private nurse; and he had part-ownership in a fine-dining restaurant partnership in Ocala, among other perks.

That Farkas, 58, managed to coax those around him to participate in the alleged scheme is testament to the firm influence he exerted on others.
Then again, the defense has suggested that the unhealthy relationships worked the other way, with Farkas being ill served and ill informed by those around him.
The government says the enterprise led Colonial BancGroup Inc. to report nearly $500 million in worthless assets, stripped $1.5 billion from Taylor Bean financing vehicle Ocala Funding LLC, and put $553 million of federal bailout funds at stake.
Bowman and five other senior-level executives at Taylor Bean and Colonial already have pleaded guilty to various charges ranging from conspiracy to commit bank, wire and securities fraud to lying to federal agents. Their testimony, to continue this week as former Taylor Bean treasurer Desiree Brown and CEO Paul R. Allen take the stand, is in exchange for a possible lesser sentence when they appear back in court in June before U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.
Farkas himself is charged in a 14-count indictment for allegedly masterminding a scheme that spanned eight years and, according to prosecutors, began as a way to hide overdrafts in Taylor Bean’s master bank account at Colonial. Taylor Bean grew at a breakneck pace but began experiencing cash flow problems in 2002, as Fannie Mae withdrew its business over suspicious loans.
The Farkas trial so far: Who misled whom?
The trial is expected to last the rest of the month

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Lee Farkas took a small mortgage company and near single-handedly built it into a national giant that funded billions of dollars in residential mortgages. But prosecutors say he relied on others — well-positioned officials at his company and its main banking partner — to help implement what the government calls a $1.9 billion scheme that brought down both institutions in 2009.
As the first week of Farkas’ bank, wire and securities fraud trial wound down last week in federal court, the co-dependent relationships between Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.’s former chairman and his associates were laid bare for a jury.
At best, these connections could yield generous perks for friends of Farkas: a $200,000 loan, no questions asked; a $300,000 salary advance; a company-funded personal housekeeper.
At worst, the relationships allowed troubling behavior to continue and led to anxiety and mounting pressure.
Raymond Bowman, Taylor Bean’s former president, spoke to the latter dynamic during his testimony on Tuesday. He recalled the day when stress over Taylor Bean’s “Plan B” scheme, in which fake mortgage loan data allegedly was submitted to Colonial Bank, led him to abruptly quit.
But his resolve wasn’t strong enough: He said Farkas paid a visit to his home that evening in late 2008. Bowman told his boss, “I can’t do this anymore. This is driving me crazy.”
Farkas’ response to his lieutenant, a former bond trader at SunTrust Bank in Atlanta, was that Taylor Bean’s dealings with Colonial were not Bowman’s problem; it was “his issue.”
Thus continued Bowman’s employment at Taylor Bean. He was paid $440,000 a year; his ill mother was supplied with a private nurse; and he had part-ownership in a fine-dining restaurant partnership in Ocala, among other perks.
That Farkas, 58, managed to coax those around him to participate in the alleged scheme is testament to the firm influence he exerted on others.
Then again, the defense has suggested that the unhealthy relationships worked the other way, with Farkas being ill served and ill informed by those around him.
■ ■ ■
The government says the enterprise led Colonial BancGroup Inc. to report nearly $500 million in worthless assets, stripped $1.5 billion from Taylor Bean financing vehicle Ocala Funding LLC, and put $553 million of federal bailout funds at stake.
Bowman and five other senior-level executives at Taylor Bean and Colonial already have pleaded guilty to various charges ranging from conspiracy to commit bank, wire and securities fraud to lying to federal agents. Their testimony, to continue this week as former Taylor Bean treasurer Desiree Brown and CEO Paul R. Allen take the stand, is in exchange for a possible lesser sentence when they appear back in court in June before U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.
Farkas himself is charged in a 14-count indictment for allegedly masterminding a scheme that spanned eight years and, according to prosecutors, began as a way to hide overdrafts in Taylor Bean’s master bank account at Colonial. Taylor Bean grew at a breakneck pace but began experiencing cash flow problems in 2002, as Fannie Mae withdrew its business over suspicious loans.
Cathie Kissick, a former senior vice president at Colonial who was head of its Orlando-based Mortgage Warehouse Lending Division, testified Thursday that she was “in too deep” by the time the alleged scheme reached its staggering proportions and led to the sixth-largest bank collapse in U.S. history.
In late 2003, her role of “sweeping” in funds overnight from one account to another evolved into what is known as Plan B. Kissick and her deputy, Teresa Kelly, enabled Taylor Bean to sell false mortgage loans to Colonial that were worthless because they had already been sold to other investors.
“It would start with a phone call (from Farkas),” Kelly, 35, testified Tuesday. “Me and Cathie would normally resist and see if Taylor Bean could cover its shortages elsewhere.”
By that time, Bowman had testified, it was already too late for Kissick: Plan B was the alternative to Taylor Bean shutting its operations, laying off all its staff, and Kissick going to jail for helping sweep overnight funds into Taylor Bean’s master account and hiding it from superiors.
As prosecutor Patrick Stokes put it in his opening statement, “They (Kissick and Kelly) thought he’d be able to turn the tide and turn his business around.”
At the outset of Plan B, Bowman said he told his boss the arrangement was “not acceptable,” as much as Farkas assured him he could reverse the deficit and pay it all back. By the time 2004 rolled around, and the hole was quickly approaching $300 million, he wrote in an email to Farkas, “When is it going to stop? This is incredibly serious, Lee.”
Farkas, said Bowman, replied with the following words: “If you owe someone $100, you have a problem. If you owe them $1 million, they have a problem.”
ALEXANDRIA, Va. — Lee Farkas took a small mortgage company and near single-handedly built it into a national giant that funded billions of dollars in residential mortgages. But prosecutors say he relied on others — well-positioned officials at his company and its main banking partner — to help implement what the government calls a $1.9 billion scheme that brought down both institutions in 2009.
As the first week of Farkas’ bank, wire and securities fraud trial wound down last week in federal court, the co-dependent relationships between Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.’s former chairman and his associates were laid bare for a jury.
At best, these connections could yield generous perks for friends of Farkas: a $200,000 loan, no questions asked; a $300,000 salary advance; a company-funded personal housekeeper.
At worst, the relationships allowed troubling behavior to continue and led to anxiety and mounting pressure.
Raymond Bowman, Taylor Bean’s former president, spoke to the latter dynamic during his testimony on Tuesday. He recalled the day when stress over Taylor Bean’s “Plan B” scheme, in which fake mortgage loan data allegedly was submitted to Colonial Bank, led him to abruptly quit.
But his resolve wasn’t strong enough: He said Farkas paid a visit to his home that evening in late 2008. Bowman told his boss, “I can’t do this anymore. This is driving me crazy.”
Farkas’ response to his lieutenant, a former bond trader at SunTrust Bank in Atlanta, was that Taylor Bean’s dealings with Colonial were not Bowman’s problem; it was “his issue.”
Thus continued Bowman’s employment at Taylor Bean. He was paid $440,000 a year; his ill mother was supplied with a private nurse; and he had part-ownership in a fine-dining restaurant partnership in Ocala, among other perks.
That Farkas, 58, managed to coax those around him to participate in the alleged scheme is testament to the firm influence he exerted on others.
Then again, the defense has suggested that the unhealthy relationships worked the other way, with Farkas being ill served and ill informed by those around him.
■ ■ ■
The government says the enterprise led Colonial BancGroup Inc. to report nearly $500 million in worthless assets, stripped $1.5 billion from Taylor Bean financing vehicle Ocala Funding LLC, and put $553 million of federal bailout funds at stake.
Bowman and five other senior-level executives at Taylor Bean and Colonial already have pleaded guilty to various charges ranging from conspiracy to commit bank, wire and securities fraud to lying to federal agents. Their testimony, to continue this week as former Taylor Bean treasurer Desiree Brown and CEO Paul R. Allen take the stand, is in exchange for a possible lesser sentence when they appear back in court in June before U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.
Farkas himself is charged in a 14-count indictment for allegedly masterminding a scheme that spanned eight years and, according to prosecutors, began as a way to hide overdrafts in Taylor Bean’s master bank account at Colonial. Taylor Bean grew at a breakneck pace but began experiencing cash flow problems in 2002, as Fannie Mae withdrew its business over suspicious loans.
Cathie Kissick, a former senior vice president at Colonial who was head of its Orlando-based Mortgage Warehouse Lending Division, testified Thursday that she was “in too deep” by the time the alleged scheme reached its staggering proportions and led to the sixth-largest bank collapse in U.S. history.
In late 2003, her role of “sweeping” in funds overnight from one account to another evolved into what is known as Plan B. Kissick and her deputy, Teresa Kelly, enabled Taylor Bean to sell false mortgage loans to Colonial that were worthless because they had already been sold to other investors.
“It would start with a phone call (from Farkas),” Kelly, 35, testified Tuesday. “Me and Cathie would normally resist and see if Taylor Bean could cover its shortages elsewhere.”
By that time, Bowman had testified, it was already too late for Kissick: Plan B was the alternative to Taylor Bean shutting its operations, laying off all its staff, and Kissick going to jail for helping sweep overnight funds into Taylor Bean’s master account and hiding it from superiors.
As prosecutor Patrick Stokes put it in his opening statement, “They (Kissick and Kelly) thought he’d be able to turn the tide and turn his business around.”
At the outset of Plan B, Bowman said he told his boss the arrangement was “not acceptable,” as much as Farkas assured him he could reverse the deficit and pay it all back. By the time 2004 rolled around, and the hole was quickly approaching $300 million, he wrote in an email to Farkas, “When is it going to stop? This is incredibly serious, Lee.”
Farkas, said Bowman, replied with the following words: “If you owe someone $100, you have a problem. If you owe them $1 million, they have a problem.”
It was this kind of rationale that peppered the flavor of a long string of emails exchanged between Farkas and other executives at Taylor Bean and Colonial throughout an eight-year period. The jury read many of them last week.
Kelly, an operations supervisor at Colonial’s Mortgage Warehouse Lending Division, testified that in June 2004, she sent Farkas an email inquiring about four suspicions loans that were missing mortgages — loans that were later dubbed as “Friend of Lee loans.”
Farkas wrote back in an email, “Those are mine, too. Darn, I will find the stuff you need.”
This promise of digging out of a hole, however small or large, became a familiar refrain to people like Bowman. He told the jury about the day federal agents came to raid Taylor Bean’s $21 million Ocala headquarters. Bowman, who was on the phone, was told to hang up and was escorted into the boardroom, where his boss was already waiting.
Taylor Bean’s former president said he quickly proposed to Farkas they provide, right then and there, a full explanation to the FBI.
“That’s not gonna happen,” he said Farkas told him. “We’re gonna work (our way) out of this.” The date was Aug. 3, 2009, more than seven years after prosecutors allege Taylor Bean first began trying to claw its way out of a cash flow hole. It was also three weeks before Taylor Bean would declare bankruptcy.
■ ■ ■
Farkas’ defense lawyers say the notion of Farkas misleading his associates is all wrong. To the contrary: They say he relied on the counsel of those around him and was misled into thinking his company was healthy.
Then, in August 2009, federal regulators swooped in and put the Ocala mortgage company, as one of the lawyers put it, “in a death spiral.”
“Mr. Farkas was not involved personally in any of these transactions,” defense attorney Craig Kuglar told the jury in his opening statement last week.
With more than half of the government’s witnesses left to testify and the defense still to present its side, that remains to be seen. Farkas’ trial is expected to last the rest of the month

The Cam Newton Banking-Scandal connection

Taylor Bean Chairman on Trial — Along With Colonial Bank and Auburn University

Apr. 4 2011 - 9:24 pm | 15,326 views | 0 recommendations | 11 comments
Today, the trial of the first big name from the financial meltdown will take place in a courtroom in Alexandria, VA as the case of the U.S. vs. Lee Farkas moves forward with opening statements.
Lee Farkas, the founder and former chairman of the now bankrupt Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. (TBW), is on trial for fraud associated with loans sold to Colonial Bank and other institutions.  TBW was a huge feeder of packaged mortgages to Colonial Bank, which was seized by government banking regulators in August 2009 and their assets taken over by BB&T.  It was the 6th largest bank to fail in the United States and the poster child of bad loans gone-bad in the state of Florida, where it was heavily invested.  Farkas is accused of conspiring with members of his staff and employees at Colonial to sell $1.5 billion in bogus mortgages to the bank.  Five people have pleaded guilty including the CEO, president and treasurer of TBW along with two executives at Colonial Bank.  Farkas must be sweating it but there’s another interesting story involving Colonial Bank that is still developing.
Four months prior to the Colonial Bank closing, its chairman and CEO, Bobby Lowder, announced his retirement.  Great timing.  No charges have been filed against Lowder, yet.   Lowder, who is on the Board of Trustees for Auburn University and graduate of Auburn, has seen his world crumble these past few years.  Besides the bank he founded in 1981 going bust, he had appointed Milton McGregor (Auburn Alum and good friend), to the board of directors of Colonial.  McGregor, whose name is more synonymous with being an athletic booster of Auburn football, also owns gambling establishments in Alabama that go under the name of VictoryLand.  McGregor was arrested this past October on bribery and fraud charges along with 10 others related to buying votes on gaming laws in the state legislature.  Also on the board of Colonial was Pat Dye, former Auburn football coach, who left the program in 1992 under the shadow of NCAA violations for alumni paying players of the team.  In fact, there were a number of Auburn alums on the board or in officer positions at Colonial including CFO Sarah Moore, COO Patti Hill, James Rane III (of YellaWood fame), William Powell III (Alabama Cattlemen Assoc) and others.  How much of a role, if any, each of these figures will play in the trial of TBW’s Farkas will be seen in the upcoming weeks.
So what did Auburn grad and Colonial Bank chairman Bobby Lowder do when the heat was on and he needed someone to take over his bank in 2009, prior to it going bust?  He chose Lewis Beville as President and CEO.  And at what fine institution did Mr. Beville matriculate?  Not Auburn….try rival University of Alabama.  And you thought these rivalries only played themselves out on the football field.
Alabama is not banking territory, it’s football territory.  So the big story there is not the Farkas trial or the banking scandal unfolding, but the FBI and NCAA continued investigation of the Auburn football program related to payments possibly made to Auburn Tiger quarterback Cam Newton (Heisman Trophy winner).  However, it probably doesn’t look good when your top player is suspected of taking payments when so many alums are affiliated with a now defunct bank.

Friday, April 8, 2011

NOAA BS about shrimpers killing turtles

Ok, I assumed this is the bull that they would spit out but I have been on water within last two weeks and talked to shrimpers and charter boats and know there are no Mississippi Shrimp boats out now. To confirm this I called and spoke with Charter boat Assn, Commercial Shrimpers Lobbyist, and both shrimping groups (Vietnamese and Anglo) Also DMR. There have been almost no shrimping activity off Mississippi coast within last month. We can not confirm even one single boat. A pilot who flew over the area for two weeks said she saw two shrimp boats the whole time and they were way over in Louisiana waters and no where close to being off Mississippi coast. So where are the freaking boats NOAA!  Lie bastards Lie!

Thursday, April 7, 2011

farkas The biggest case you never heard of....In day four now

If you want to see what caused the collapse, here is a place to start, hundreds of millions in completely made up loans...I kid you not.


Bloomberg

Ex-Taylor, Bean Official Admits Guilt in $1.9 Billion Fraud

February 24, 2011, 5:11 PM EST

 

By Tom Schoenberg
(Updates with bond set by judge in sixth paragraph.)
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- The former treasurer of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp., once the 12th largest mortgage lender in the U.S., admitted helping run a $1.9 billion fraud scheme that targeted the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program and contributed to the failure of Colonial Bank.
Desiree Brown, 45, pleaded guilty in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, to conspiring to commit wire fraud, securities fraud and bank fraud, and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors bringing Lee Farkas, former chairman of Taylor, Bean, to trial on April 4. Brown also settled civil charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC said.
Until today, Farkas, 58, was the only person charged in what the government said was a massive scheme to deceive financial firms and TARP by covering up shortfalls at Taylor, Bean, once the largest non-depository mortgage lender in the U.S., according to the SEC’s statement on the case. Farkas was indicted on 16 counts in June and faces the possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison, according to a Justice Department statement.
“Were there other people besides Mr. Farkas who were involved in this scheme,” U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema asked Brown at the plea hearing?
“Yes ma’am,” Brown answered.
Brown, of Hernando, Florida, faces a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison, a $250,000 fine and an order to pay restitution to more than 250 victims. Brown, who is to be sentenced on June 10, was released on a $50,000 unsecured bond.
Hidden Overdrafts
The crime included conspiring to transfer funds between closely held Taylor Bean and Colonial Bank, a unit of Colonial BancGroup Inc., to hide overdrafts, prosecutors said. The bank was one of the 50 largest in the U.S., according to the government.
The SEC’s complaint alleges Brown violated antifraud, reporting, books and records and internal controls provisions of federal securities laws. She agreed to an injunction against future violations without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations.
In the criminal case, Brown admitted that from late 2003 through August 2009, she, Farkas and other unidentified individuals conspired to defraud Colonial Bank, Colonial BancGroup Inc., shareholders of Colonial BancGroup, TARP, and investors in Ocala Funding LLC, which included Deutsche Bank AG and BNP Paribas SA, according to Brown’s statements in court and a Justice Department statement.
Scheme to Defraud
One of the goals of the scheme was to obtain funding for Taylor, Bean to help cover expenses for operations and “servicing payments owed to third-party purchasers of loans and/or mortgage-backed securities,” the department said in the statement.
The U.S. said the scheme contributed to the failures of Colonial Bank and Taylor, Bean, which was based in Ocala, Florida.
William Cummings, a lawyer for Farkas, attended today’s hearing. In an interview, he said he expected more guilty pleas before his client goes to trial. He said his client, who has pleaded not guilty, has had some settlement discussions with the government though “nothing has come out of it yet.”
Brown said in court that she has been talking with the government for the past six months. Brown was vice president of special projects at Taylor, Bean starting in October 2002. In 2004, she was named controller and then treasurer.
Fake Mortgage Assets
Brown, Farkas and unnamed conspirators sold Colonial Bank more than $400 million in fake mortgage assets in a scheme they called “Plan B,” according to the Justice Department statement.
The conspirators sent mortgage data to Colonial Bank for loans that didn’t exist or that Taylor, Bean had already committed or sold to other third-party investors, the Justice Department said.
“As a result, the Plan B loan data was recorded in Colonial Bank’s books and records, and gave the false appearance that Colonial Bank had purchased legitimate interests in mortgage loans from TBW,” the department said.
Brown, Farkas and the conspirators diverted more than $1 billion from Ocala Funding, a mortgage lending facility controlled by Taylor, Bean & Whitaker to cover its losses, according to the statement.
Ocala Funding sold asset-backed commercial paper to financial institutions including Deutsche Bank, Germany’s biggest bank, and Paris-based BNP Paribas, according to Farkas’s indictment.
Operating Losses
In 2008, when Taylor, Bean’s operating losses mounted, Farkas and his conspirators allegedly tried through Colonial BancGroup, Colonial Bank’s Montgomery, Alabama-based holding company, to obtain about $553 million through TARP, prosecutors said.
The application for funding included false information, and investigators detected irregularities before any TARP money was released, according to the Justice Department.
Alabama regulators seized Colonial Bank in 2009 and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was appointed as receiver. Colonial BancGroup filed for bankruptcy in 2009.
The Brown case is USA v. Brown, 1:11-cr-00084, and the Farkas case is USA v. Farkas, 1:10-cr-00200, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria).
--Editors: Fred Strasser, Stephen Farr
To contact the reporter on this story: Tom Schoenberg in Washington at tschoenberg@bloomberg.net.

http://www.justice.gov/opa/documents/farkas-indictment.pdf

day One
http://www.ocala.com/article/20110404/ARTICLES/110409890

Day two
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-04-06/taylor-bean-ex-chairman-ran-conspiracy-former-president-says.html

Day three
http://www.ocala.com/article/20110406/articles/110409800

Day four
http://www.ocala.com/article/20110407/wire/110409761

Timeline:
http://www.ocala.com/article/20110402/articles/110409930&tc=yahoo

Goldman Sachs is killing you at the pump...again

Old Bible verse "Gold is the root of all evil."

New verse: "Goldman Sachs is the root of all evil.

 

The Real Reason Gas Prices Are Soaring

by admin on April 2, 2011
According to an oil-trading veteran, a flood of new investors is the real reason behind ever-increasing fuel prices.

MSN Money reports:
Have you ever wondered why when you go to the gas station to fill up the family car, the price of gas at the pump has just jumped 25 cents a gallon over the past three days? Perhaps you thought the oil companies were just being greedy. Or you believed the nightly news pundit who said that gas prices went up because the crisis in Libya was affecting supplies of oil. One professional oil trader says that you’d be wrong on both counts.
Dan Dicker, who has spent nearly three decades in the oil market, has a profoundly disturbing explanation of why the price of oil, and the gasoline that comes from the crude product, has risen so dramatically in recent months. It turns out, Dicker says, that the price has nothing to do with supply and demand for oil. It’s the financial market for oil, filled with both professional speculators and amateur investors betting on poorly understood oil exchange-traded funds, who have ratcheted up the price of gas to such sky high levels.
“There is no supply issue going on here — what you have is the perception of the possibility of a supply issue,” Dicker says. “A whole bunch of people are pouring money into an oil market trying to take advantage of what they perceive to be a real risk in supply. It’s a marketplace that I argue should not be allowed to be wagered on like a stock or bond.”
 
 

It's ok now to lie, and send an innocent man too death row for 14 years

I don't have a lot to add to this, except to repeat the old slogan, "The law is an Ass."  Injustice for all.....

 

An alarming Supreme Court ruling against an innocent man

Apr 05, 2011
I have written of a case like this previously (i.e. exoneree Greg Wilhoit on Oklahoma's death row) but this case has a different twist. The exoneree was seeking compensation from the District Attorney for the years he spent on death row because a prosecutor who worked for his office hid evidence that would have freed him---a blood test among other things. The Supreme Court ruling (5-4) written by Justice Clarence Thomas states that while there was "misconduct" by the prosecutor (Ginsburg points out there were actually four prosecutors involved), that "did not prove deliberate indifference" by the District Attorney.
 The Court does not seem to deny that this grave misconduct happened.  But somehow the attorneys for Thompson had to prove that the hiding of the evidence showed  "deliberate indifference " by the district attorney's office, by showing, for example that this was no mere single incident but instead was a pattern of misconduct. When Thompson was exonerated he was days away from execution. Any reasonable person would have to conclude that if evidence had been withheld, especially very hard evidence like a blood test, then the actions of the prosecutors were worse than "deliberate indifference"; they were criminal.
The Supreme Court in the United States is the court of last resort--the last stop. Your pleas can go no further.  That is what is so disturbing about this ruling.  As you read the LA TIMES story you learn a few additional facts about this case.  Not only did the prosecution hide a blood test which would have proven Thompson's innocence they also hid eye witness evidence from the defense that also would have proven his innocence.  In addition, Thompson's attorneys provided evidence of other similar cases in New Orleans where key evidence was hidden from defese attorneys. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg said in her dissent that the court was shielding a city and its prosecutors for "flagrant" misconduct that nearly cost a man his life.
These are serious charges against the New Orleans's district attorney's office. The evidence that was brought forth by Thompson's lawyers before this court showed that at least four prosecutors  knew of the hidden blood test.  Apparently, those prosecutors did nothing to right this wrong. I do not know what the attorneys representing Thompson needed to do to prove their case. But you can believe that this was about money and power. 
When a wrongful conviction occurs whom do you hold accountable? That 's a question that must be asked if you seek to apply restorative justice to this case. It's an important question and it is why this case went all the way to the Supreme Court.  Thompson was seeking compensation for the 14 wasted and fearful years on death row. Thompson was attempting to hold the district attorney's office accountable. The Supreme Court's ruling concluded that the prosecutors' boss is not responsible for this travesty of justice.
According to the Innocence Project as of 2011 there have been 261 exonerations in the U.S.  That number is approximate since the Innocent Project was formed in 1992.  Before that date few organizations worked on this issue (except one that I am aware of which is the Centurion Ministries).  In 2007 there were 200 innocent men exonerated based on DNA evidence. Of that 200 the Innocence Project states that approximately 45 % have received some compensation for the years in prison or death row with amounts ranging from $25,000 to $12.12 million. (source: Christian Science Monitor) This compensation usually comes by way of standardized compensation statutes on a state by state basis. Some states have laws determining the rate of compensation and some don't. That, too, is changing but not without a fight. 
What is alarming with this Supreme Court ruling against an innocent man is that the ruling seems to reflect the same attitude as the New Orleans's District Attorney's office. It just apparently doesn't care whether John Thompson was falsely convicted and almost executed. Ultimately, the question of who to hold liable is unanswered.
I do a lot of work on restorative justice issues online through blogs like RJONLINE and other social networking sites. I said when this ruling came down that this does not mean it is over.  It might be over today for this innocent man, John Thompson, but cases like this will be back.  Someone is to blame for wrongful convictions. Sometimes errors are made, all too often due to misidentification of eye witnesses, but what we see here is a deliberate case of misconduct. Justice Thomas was looking for a pattern of wrong doing instead of clear evidence of wrong doing in this singular case. However, Justice Ginsburg is right. Can flagrant misconduct that nearly cost a man his life be ignored?
What we should care about ---and I think it is a moral imperative-- is how to make things right after wrongful convictions and attempt to pay back the innocent person
Some ask how can you pay back someone for lost years in prison or death row? It's not easy but at the very least our justice system should attempt to do so. The Supreme Court failed to do just that in this ruling. This problem is far from over.